In the wake of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension, some voices have argued
that Senate President Godswill Akpabio should step aside to allow for an investigation into
her allegations of sexual harassment. But what exactly would be investigated?
A close examination of her petition to the Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges raises
serious questions about its credibility. The claims she presented amount to:
1.
An Alleged Conversation – She claims that he held her hand and made a comment
about them “coming back together someday.”
2.
A Visit to a Guest House – She alleges that he made a vague statement about wanting
to be “happy.”
Are these statements alone grounds for convening an investigative panel and wasting
taxpayers’ money? Let’s apply basic logic and due process:
●
No Witnesses – If there were credible witnesses, an investigation might be worth
considering. But she has presented none.
●
No Prior Reports – If she had confided in someone at the time, including her own
husband, it might add some weight. She did not.
●
No Video or Audio Evidence – In an era where recordings are common, she has
provided no such proof.
●
No Chat Records – If there were incriminating messages, she would have shared them
long ago. Again, there are none.
Not a single shred of concrete evidence has been provided to support this claim. So, on what
basis should the Senate President step aside?
This is not the first time Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has made unverified accusations. She
previously accused Reno Omokri of sexual misconduct, only to later delete her posts and pay
damages after failing to substantiate her claims. While no one expects victims of harassment
to be perfect, the truth still matters—because when false or weaponized allegations are
made, they undermine real victims and make it harder for them to be believed.
This sets a dangerous precedent. If an elected leader can be pressured to resign over
unsubstantiated allegations, then no one is safe from politically motivated accusations.
Imagine a world where a mere handshake, a harmless remark, or even a compliment can be
twisted into an allegation of misconduct. That’s not justice—it’s weaponized defamation.
In countries like the UK, false allegations are taken seriously. Making baseless claims of
sexual harassment could lead to criminal or civil action for perverting the course of justice
and wasting public resources. Such reckless accusations could have severe legal
consequences, yet in Nigeria, we are expected to treat them as fact without scrutiny.
This is not about undermining the importance of addressing sexual harassment—it is about
ensuring that accusations are backed by evidence and due process is followed. Without that,
this is nothing more than a politically motivated distraction.
Nigeria must not allow unverified claims to dictate governance. Facts matter. Due process
matters. And baseless allegations must not be used as a tool for political manipulation.